NU671 Unit 6 Discussion – Evidence-Based Practice Herzing

NU671 Unit 6 Discussion – Evidence-Based Practice Herzing

 

Discussion: Unit 6, Due Wednesday by 11:59 pm CT

Evidence-Based Practice

Instructions:

It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.

Classroom Participation:

Students are expected to address the initial discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s), you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however, should be correlated to the literature.

All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criteria inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing, and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion or the initial discussion is late, you will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above.

Initial Discussion Question/Prompt [Due Wednesday]

Consider the following questions in your initial discussion post:

• Review the partial SOAP note accessed through this link.
  • EBP SOAP Note[Word Doc]

Initial Post

Post a discussion constructed as the ‘P’ (treatment plan) that completes the partial SOAP note accessed through the link above.

Include in the discussion:

1. 1. Your treatment “Plan” for the first two diagnoses (see note below on how to structure the ‘P’)
   2. Citations for each of the evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions included in your Plan
   3. For each article you cited in support of an element of the Plan, provide your thoughts about the strength of the evidence presented in the article(s)

Plan (P):

These are the interventions that relate to each individual, numbered diagnosis.

Document individual plans directly after each corresponding assessment (Ex. Assessment­ Plan). Address the following aspects (they should be separated out as listed below):

Diagnostics: labs, diagnostics testing – tests that you planned for/ordered during the encounter that you plan to review/evaluate relative to your workup for the patient’s chief complaint

Therapeutic: changes in meds, skincare, counseling, include full prescribing information for any pharmacologic interventions including quantity and number of refills for any new or refilled medications.

Educational: information clients need in order to address their health problems. Include follow­ up care. Anticipatory guidance and counseling.

Consultation/Collaboration: referrals or consult while in clinic with another provider. If no referral made was there a possible referral you could make and why? Advance care planning.

NOTE: please input N/A where appropriate for the above 4 categories, do not assume that your clinical faculty person will know it was not applicable.

Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text citations and corresponding references in APA format.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria.

Estimated time to complete: 2 hours

Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt [Due Sunday]

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts with substantive comments using the following steps:

• Construct a response – ideally one who utilized the same EBP interventions that you did and one who did not.
  • Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment.
  • References and citations should conform to APA standards.
  • Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.
  • Plagiarism is never acceptable – give credit when credit is due – cite your sources.

Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis and include peer-reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with in-text citations and corresponding references in APA format.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets the criteria. Collaboration points will be forfeited if you fail to meet the response post guidelines.

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format where appropriate.

Estimated time to complete: 1 hour